Constructing a NEP polarizability model
Introduction
In this tutorial, we will show you how to use the GPUMD
package to train a NEP polarizability model and analyze the results. For theoretical background on the NEP approach, please read the documentation. A paper that introduces the NEP polarizability model systematically is in preparation.
Prerequisites
You need to have access to an NVIDIA GPU with compute capability >= 3.5. Besides it, CUDA Toolkit 9.0 or higher is needed to compile the GPUMD package. The latest GPUMD (we recommend v3.7 or newer) can be downloaded here. Unpack it, go to the src
directory, and run the command make -j
to compile. If success, you should get two executables: gpumd
and nep
in the src
directory. The flag “-std=c++14” in makefile can be modified
to “-std=c++11” if you failed the compilation process.
Train a NEP polarizability model for QM7B database
To train a NEP polarizability model, two files: train.xyz
and nep.in
are mandatory. The train.xyz
file contains necessary training data, and the nep.in
file contains some parameters used for training. Optionally, one can also provide a test.xyz
file that has similar contents as thetrain.xyz
for validation.
Prepare the train.xyz and test.xyz files
The
train.xyz
/test.xyz
file should be prepared according to the documentation.In this tutorial,
train.xyz
andtest.xyz
files are already prepared in the current folder, which contain 5768 and 1443 structures, respectively. Structures as well as polarizability data in thetrain.xyz
andtest.xyz
are taken from the QM7B database that contains 7211 organic compounds. The (static) polarizability is a symmetric second-order tensor that has a form of\[\begin{split}\boldsymbol{\alpha }=\left( \begin{matrix} \alpha _{xx}& \alpha _{xy}& \alpha _{xz}\\ \alpha _{yx}& \alpha _{yy}& \alpha _{yz}\\ \alpha _{zx}& \alpha _{zy}& \alpha _{zz}\\ \end{matrix} \right)\end{split}\]The polarizability data are embedded in the comment lines of
train.xyz
/test.xyz
, organized as *pol=” \(\alpha _{xx}\) $:nbsphinx-math:alpha `*{xy} $ :math:alpha _{xz}` \(\alpha _{yx}\) $:nbsphinx-math:alpha `*{yy} $ :math:alpha _{yz}` \(\alpha _{zx}\) $:nbsphinx-math:alpha `_{zy} $ :math:alpha _{zz}`”* per structure. The polarizability data were computed at the CCSD/d-aug-cc-pVDZ level of theory by Yang and collaborators. Of course, you can use any quantum mechanics package and any theoretical method such as the DFT to calculate the polarizability. However, structures in QM7B database are without lattice information, which is mandatory in the training of NEP models. Therefore, a cubic box with a dimension of 100 \(\rm \mathring{A}\) was set for every structure. We recommend the ASE package to manipulate thetrain.xyz
/test.xyz
file.
Prepare the nep.in
file.
First, read the documentation regarding input paramaters carefully. The most important parameter is
model_type
, which controls the training types.model_type=0
which is default, stands for a training task of PES;model_type=1
, a training task of dipole;model_type=2
, a training task of polarizability. Here, we setmodel_type=2
. A minimalnep.in
file reads:
type 6 H C N O S Cl
model_type 2
The parameter type
is also important, which specified the element kinds in the system. The first value 6
is the number of elements in train.xyz
/test.xyz
, followed by the detailed element names, in this case, H C N O S Cl
. The order will be frozen in the model after training. We have prepared the nep.in
file in the current folder, which reads:
type 6 H C N O S Cl
model_type 2
cutoff 6 4
n_max 6 6
basis_size 10 10
l_max 4 2 1
neuron 10
population 80
batch 10000
generation 200000
lambda_1 0.03
lambda_2 0.03
The values of parameters cutoff
, n_max
,basis_size
,l_max
, neuron
,population
used here were tested elaborately, which achieved a good balance between the accuracy and costs. The batch size depends on your GPU device. On a GeForce RTX 3090 with 24 GB memory, you can train the model with all data at the same time, therefore, we set batch
a value greater than 5768. The lambda_1
and lambda_1
are the regularization
paramaters. You can take the default values trustingly just ignore these two parameters. The GPUMD
will adjust these two parameters dynamically according to the real-time loss. Alternatively, you can set lambda_1 and lambda_2 a fixed value which should be of the same order as the target quantities upon convergence. In this example, we set lambda_1=lambda_2=0.03
.We
will look back on it after analyzing the results.
Run the nep
executable
Run the following command in the working directory
path/to/nep # if you use linux
path\to\nep # if you use Windows
It took about 22 hours to run 200,000 generations using a GeForce RTX 3090. One can kill the task at any time and also restart it just by running the nep
again.
Check the training results
After you launch the
nep
task, there should be some output on the screen. We encourage the user to read the screen output carefully. It can help to understand the working flow ofnep
.Some files will be generated in the current folder and will be updated every 100 generations (some will be updated every 1000 generations). Therefore, one can check the results even before finishing the maximum number of generations as set in
nep.in
.If the user has not read the documentation regarding the output files, it is time to read about those here.
We will use Python to visualize the results in some of the output files next. We first load
pylab
that we need.
[2]:
from pylab import *
Checking the loss.out
file
We see that the \(\mathcal{L}_1\) and \(\mathcal{L}_2\) regularization loss functions first increases and then decreases, which indicates the effectiveness of the regularization.
The polarizability loss is the root mean square error (RMSE) of polarizability per atom, which converges to about 0.03-0.04 a.u./atom.
[3]:
loss = loadtxt('loss.out')
loglog(loss[:, 1:4])
loglog(loss[:, 4:6])
xlabel('Generation/100')
ylabel('Loss')
legend(['Total', 'L1-regularization', 'L2-regularization', 'Polarizability-train', 'Polarizability-train'])
tight_layout()
The loss terms ‘Polarizability-train’ and ‘Polarizability-train’ converged after 20,000 generations (But you can run it longer). That’s why we choose the paramaters lambda_1=lambda_2=0.03
. But you can take the default values trustingly.
Checking the polarizability_test.out
file
The polarizability_test.out
is organized as “\(\alpha _{xx}\) $:nbsphinx-math:alpha `*{yy} $ :math:alpha _{zz}` \(\alpha _{xy}\) $:nbsphinx-math:alpha `*{yz} $ :math:alpha _{xz}` \(\alpha _{xx}\) $:nbsphinx-math:alpha `*{yy} $ :math:alpha _{zz}` \(\alpha _{xy}\) $:nbsphinx-math:alpha `*{yz} $ :math:alpha _{xz}`”, one line per structure. The first six values are predicted by NEP
, while the last six values are the references we provide in
test.xyz
(but divided by the number of atoms).
[6]:
# for diagonal elements
pol_diag_test = loadtxt('polarizability_test.out',usecols=(0,1,2,6,7,8))
ref_values = np.hstack([pol_diag_test[:,3],pol_diag_test[:,4],pol_diag_test[:,5]])
nep_values = np.hstack([pol_diag_test[:,0],pol_diag_test[:,1],pol_diag_test[:,2]])
plot(ref_values,nep_values , '.')
plot(linspace(pol_diag_test.min(),pol_diag_test.max()), linspace(pol_diag_test.min(),pol_diag_test.max()), '-')
xlim((pol_diag_test.min(),pol_diag_test.max()))
ylim((pol_diag_test.min(),pol_diag_test.max()))
xlabel('Reference diagonal polarizability (a.u./atom)')
ylabel('NEP diagonal polarizability (a.u./atom)')
fig = plt.gcf()
fig.set_size_inches(4,4)
tight_layout()
[7]:
# for off-diagonal elements
pol_offdiag_test = loadtxt('polarizability_test.out',usecols=(3,4,5,9,10,11))
ref_values = np.hstack([pol_offdiag_test[:,3],pol_offdiag_test[:,4],pol_offdiag_test[:,5]])
nep_values = np.hstack([pol_offdiag_test[:,0],pol_offdiag_test[:,1],pol_offdiag_test[:,2]])
plot(ref_values,nep_values , '.')
plot(linspace(pol_offdiag_test.min(),pol_offdiag_test.max()), linspace(pol_offdiag_test.min(),pol_offdiag_test.max()), '-')
xlim((pol_offdiag_test.min(),pol_offdiag_test.max()))
ylim((pol_offdiag_test.min(),pol_offdiag_test.max()))
xlabel('Reference off-diagonal polarizability (a.u./atom)')
ylabel('NEP off-diagonal polarizability (a.u./atom)')
fig = plt.gcf()
fig.set_size_inches(4,4)
tight_layout()
Get molecular polarizability
Numbers of atoms are varied for different structures in the QM7B database. To get their polarizability, we should know their numbers of atoms. The following Python
script can be used to obtain the molecular polarizability for each structure in test.xyz
.
[16]:
import os
file_size = os.path.getsize("test.xyz")
noa_list = []
with open("test.xyz") as reader:
while (reader.tell() < file_size):
noa = int(reader.readline())
noa_list.append(noa)
for i in range(noa+1):
reader.readline()
atomic_pol_diag_test = loadtxt('polarizability_test.out',usecols=(0,1,2,6,7,8))
molecular_diagonal_polarizability = atomic_pol_diag_test * np.tile(np.array(noa_list).reshape(-1,1),(1,6))
print("Diagonal elements:")
print(molecular_diagonal_polarizability)
atomic_pol_offdiag_test = loadtxt('polarizability_test.out',usecols=(3,4,5,9,10,11))
molecular_offdiag_polarizability = atomic_pol_offdiag_test * np.tile(np.array(noa_list).reshape(-1,1),(1,6))
print("Off-diagonal elements:")
print(molecular_offdiag_polarizability)
Diagonal elements:
[[ 86.93239 81.89478 64.59779 86.77072 81.95972 63.94601]
[ 66.87154 75.06843 70.12993 67.42251 75.463 70.00906]
[ 95.30625 72.51928 69.21652 95.10905 72.87611 68.8432 ]
...
[ 65.3233 67.70946 55.286 65.57978 67.49064 55.38372]
[ 78.4861 118.855 47.02907 77.48224 119.3984 47.36193]
[ 68.6895 70.45695 68.69175 68.29755 70.4676 68.9577 ]]
Off-diagonal elements:
[[-2.1363730e+00 -2.0750540e+00 7.9340360e+00 -1.8626050e+00
-1.8792140e+00 7.2918270e+00]
[ 1.8631660e+00 1.6867077e+00 8.0070000e-01 2.1008430e+00
1.8908760e+00 6.6708000e-01]
[ 1.4109745e+01 3.6405840e+00 1.7375190e+00 1.4100157e+01
3.8441590e+00 1.6899003e+00]
...
[ 6.9831720e-01 -1.1632208e+00 6.2205360e+00 9.8580300e-01
-9.8249060e-01 6.4980860e+00]
[ 3.3778140e+01 -6.1842220e-02 2.8229300e-02 3.3851840e+01
-8.4909000e-02 2.3642960e-02]
[-1.2690855e-01 9.5440650e-02 -8.6488950e+00 -1.1436195e-01
9.4393050e-02 -8.2682400e+00]]
Prediction
You can switch the workding mode from training to prediction by adding an extra parameter
prediction 1
innep.in
, and provide atrain.xyz
. In this mode, the polarizability data is not necessary intrain.xyz
. TheNEP
will use-1e+06
as the reference values inpolarizability_train.out
. We also provide an example in theprediction_new_molecule
directory.
Restart
After each 100 steps, the
nep.restart
file will be updated.If
nep.restart
exists, it means you want to continue the previous training. Remember not to change the parameters related to the descriptor and the number of neurons. Otherwise the restarting behavior is undefined.If you want to train from scratch, you need to delete
nep.restart
first (better to first make a copy of all the results from the previous training).
Author
Nan Xu
[ ]: